Since 2017
At the forefront of digital asset and cybercrime law.
Built for the age of agentic AI.
- Digital assets & cybercrime since 2017 — before most firms knew the field existed
- 130+ cybercrime matters — AI-driven theft of crypto, data, and IP
- We pursue the exchanges, carriers, and institutions that let it happen
Why Now
Wealth is built, stored, and attacked differently now.
A generation of wealth now lives in digital form, moves across borders, and faces threats the old playbook was never built for. The frameworks are racing to catch up — NIST has launched a dedicated initiative to set standards for AI agents, acknowledging that existing security models were never designed for systems that reason, decide, and act on their own.
The attack is now run by AI. The response has to be run by counsel.
The threat has changed
AI no longer just advises the attacker — it runs the attack, prices the ransom from your own records, and weaponizes your regulatory exposure. A modern breach is a two-front crisis: the attacker threatens to expose you, while the law requires you to notify regulators and clients yourself.
We built the firm for this
Three practices that meet the new landscape end to end — protecting the wealth you’ve built, moving it across borders, and recovering it when it’s taken.
Practices
Three practices. One point of accountability.
Wealth under threat rarely respects practice-area lines. You bring the situation; we bring the right people and own the outcome — from protecting what you’ve built to recovering what’s taken.
Who We Serve
Our Clients
We advise companies vulnerable to cyberattacks, founders, wealth advisors, digital asset innovators, and private individuals.
Our practice was built for complex matters — the problems other firms decline because the answer isn’t obvious.
Discreet, practical legal solutions where wealth is at risk and judgment matters more than precedent.
The Model
You hire Max. Max brings the bench.
You retain one attorney and one point of contact. Behind him: the people who ran the systems your adversaries exploit, and the institutions that execute — assembled around your specific matter, all under privilege.
Former federal cyber-enforcement
Retired FBI and IC3 cybercrime agents who spent their careers on the other side of these cases — investigative capability a standard firm can’t offer.
Institutional specialists
Forensic accountants, offshore and trust execution partners, immigration, tax, and licensing counsel — matched to the problem, not a template.
One point of accountability
You don’t manage a committee of vendors. Max originates the strategy, coordinates the bench, and owns the result.
Privilege, intact
The entire response runs under attorney-client privilege — so what you share to solve the problem strengthens your position instead of creating exposure.
By the Numbers