An Overview of the Laws Governing Virtual Tokens

December 23, 2017  |   By: Max Dilendorf, Esq., Rika Khurdayan, Esq. And Gleb Zaslavsky, Esq.

In July 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released an investigative report on DAO Tokens, a virtual token, finding that they were securities under a 1933 federal law. But the SEC was not the first government agency to assert jurisdiction over the burgeoning virtual-token market based on long-standing laws, and it won’t be the last.

As virtual tokens have become more prominent as tools for raising capital, various state and federal agencies in the U.S. have moved to exercise regulatory authority over them. Even without new laws that specifically target virtual tokens, the laws and regulations governing them are many and complex, including:

  • Federal securities laws
  • Money-services laws
  • The Commodity Exchange Act
  • State blue sky laws; and
  • Consumer-protection laws.

These five areas of law and the consequences for violating them are explored in more detail below.

Federal Securities Laws

The Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 govern the offer, issuance, and resale of securities throughout the United States. In its report on DAO Tokens, the SEC made clear that virtual tokens could be securities under these laws.

The most fundamental rule of the federal securities laws is that securities must generally be registered with the SEC before they can be offered or sold, an onerous process in terms of both time and money.

Failure to register a security with the SEC can result in civil and criminal liability for the seller. If the seller is an entity, then any individuals who control that entity will be jointly and severally liable with it.

Money-Services Laws

Money-services businesses in the United States are governed by the states and federal government. At the federal level, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has stated that some virtual-token businesses are “money transmitters” under federal law. As such, they are required to be licensed by a state and registered with the federal government.

Failure to comply with the federal money-services laws is a federal crime punishable by hefty fines, imprisonment for up to five years, or both.

Commodity Exchange Act

 Commodities in the United States are regulated by the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA). The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has regulatory authority under the CEA, and has stated that virtual currencies are commodities. The CFTC’s reasoning likely also extends to virtual tokens.

In general, the CFTC exercises enforcement jurisdiction in cases involving derivatives contracts or fraud or manipulation affecting interstate commerce. Certain financial instruments must also be registered with the CFTC before they can be sold. Violations of the CEA can result in civil or criminal liability.

State Blue Sky Laws

In addition to the federal securities laws described above, each state also has its own securities regulations, commonly referred to as blue sky laws.

Although many states’ definitions of a security track that used in the federal law, still others use a broader test. In short, even if a virtual token is not considered a security subject to registration under the federal Securities Act, the states in which it is offered may consider it a security and require state registration.

Consumer-Protection Laws

Finally, the offer, marketing, and sale of virtual tokens are subject to state and federal consumer-protection laws. These laws protect against fraud, false advertising, and other deceptive acts or practices. The penalties for violating such laws vary by state, but often include one or more of the following: double or treble damages, attorneys’ fees, court costs, or criminal prosecution.


Although Congress, state legislatures, and regulators have been slow to adopt new laws or regulations addressing virtual tokens, such tokens are nevertheless subject to a wide range of existing laws and regulatory regimes. Developers entering the market must be mindful of these diverse laws and careful to comply with them.

For help doing so, developers should turn to the expert lawyers of Dilendorf & Khurdayan, a New York City law firm that represents clients in connection with token generation events (also known as initial coin offerings or ICOs), providing a comprehensive overview of, and robust plan for compliance with, applicable state and federal law.

This article is provided for your convenience and does not constitute legal advice. The information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Other Resources


Our Founding Partner


Max (Maksim) Dilendorf, Esq.

Max (Maksim) Dilendorf’s legal practice is laser-focused on digital assets and cyber-crime cases, a domain he has passionately pursued since 2017. Over the past 7 years, Max built a distinct digital asset law practice, dedicating tens of thousands of hours to managing diverse client cases, research and engaging ...

Learn More about Max (Maksim) Dilendorf, Esq.
Max (Maksim) Dilendorf, Esq.

Adam Pollock

Adam is one of the nation’s leading young whistleblower lawyers.  He brings with him a special ability not just to litigate, but to investigate – and understand – complex organizations and transactions.  His extensive familiarity with tech issues is built on a computer science degree and work as a ...

Learn More about Adam Pollock
Adam Pollock

Bari Zahn, Esq.

Bari Zahn has nearly 20 years of experience practicing at global law firms in New York. Bari has represented a broad array of multinational clients on U.S. and cross-border transactions. She has supervised legal teams worldwide and has extensive management experience as the Founder, former CEO and General ...

Learn More about Bari Zahn, Esq.
Bari Zahn, Esq.

Steve Cohen

Steve contributes extensive business and problem-solving experience to challenges that may require litigation – or may help avoid it.  Indeed, his perspective on litigation is influenced by his experience as a three-time internet start-up CEO.

Steve served on Ronald Reagan’s 1980 presidential campaign ...

Learn More about Steve Cohen
Steve Cohen

Robin Gerofsky Kaptzan, Esq.

A New York licensed attorney with three decades of legal and business experience in the U.S. and Asia, Robin recently joined the law firm as a partner and leads the Asia-Pacific practice.

While acting as an international business lawyer and global corporate general counsel, Robin is sought out by clients ...

Learn More about Robin Gerofsky Kaptzan, Esq.
Robin Gerofsky Kaptzan, Esq.

Craig S. Redler

Craig S. Redler has held positions with Amicorp in its offices in Auckland New Zealand and Miami Florida, and Southpac Trust International, Inc. with offices in the Cook Islands and Tauranga New Zealand. His responsibilities included serving as Trustee for off-shore trusts settled by high net-worth clients ...

Learn More about Craig S. Redler
Craig S. Redler

Pamela A. Fuller, Esq.

Pamela A. Fuller is a corporate and international tax attorney, with over two decades of experience.  She advises a wide range of clients–including private and public companies, joint ventures, private equity and hedge funds, C-Suite executives, private U.S and foreign individual clients, and government ...

Learn More about Pamela A. Fuller, Esq.
Pamela A. Fuller, Esq.