Can an NFT Platform be Considered a Financial Institution Under Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020?

March 22, 2021  |   By: Max Dilendorf, Esq.

Special thanks to Bari Zahn, Esq (Zahn Law Group) and Moish Peltz (Falcon Rappaport & Berkman)  for their insights and comments on this article.

On January 1, 2021, Congress passed the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Act of 2020 (Act) as part of the National Defense Authorization program.

The new Act has expanded the definition of “financial institution” under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).

The term “financial institution” now includes “dealers in art” and companies that engage in transmitting virtual currencies.  Art dealers have traditionally been a target for money laundering, and the new Act aims to clean this up.

As such, a platform or an entity that facilitates the trading of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and/or movement of virtual currency from one party to another may be subject to federal and state money transmitter licensing requirements as well as federal law enforcement jurisdiction.

According to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), as a money transmitter, Peer to Peer (P2P) exchanges are required to comply with the BSA obligations that apply to money transmitters, including registering with FinCen as a money service business and complying with AML program, recordkeeping and reporting requirements (including filing SARs and CTRs).

Financial institutions found in violation of a BSA may be subject to criminal fines or five years imprisonment, or both.  If a financial institution commits a BSA violation in conjunction with violating other U.S. laws (e.g., unregistered sale of securities), that institution or individual may subject to a fine of up to $500,000 or ten years in prison or both.  In some cases, NFTs can be deemed securities subject to the U.S. SEC Laws and Regulations.

For example, a recent complaint filed by the Southern District of New York and the FBI resulted in the indictment of Arthur Hayes and several of his colleagues at BitMEX, who allegedly violated the BSA by failing to establish, implement and maintain an adequate AML program.

The defendants operated an offshore crypto exchange that allegedly operated in the shadows of the financial markets, evading AML and KYC requirements. The investigation resulted in an indictment where the defendants could be sentenced to up to five years in federal prison.

Another component of the Act is the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”), which subjects “reporting companies” to the disclosure of information about “beneficial owners”, defined as people who are directly or indirectly exercising substantial control over the entity, as well as any “applicant” who wishes to benefit from the company’s investments.

While many entities are exempt from such filings under the CTA, virtual currency traders and NFT platforms are not specifically mentioned, leading one to believe they could be included among the financial institutions facing additional regulation under the Act.

In addition, as noted above, it is important to keep in mind that each State has its own money transmitter law, which may now be triggered if this expanded definition of a financial institution is incorporated into a State’s money transmitter statutes.

Also, from a tax perspective, there are many rules and regulations that specifically apply to financial institutions, which do not apply to other types of companies.

For example, just one that comes to mind is what is known in tax parlance as the Portfolio Debt Exemption.  This favorable provision allows certain non-US borrowers to earn interest income on specified “Registered Form” loans made to U.S. companies without withholding tax, which is a flat 30% tax, unless a lower tax treaty rate applies.  However, this benefit generally is not available to a non-US bank loaning to a US entity.

Many gray areas remain for DeFi, crypto and NFT art.  For these reasons, NFT/DeFi market participants should be vigilant and carefully map liabilities that may arise as the result of the Act and National Defense Authorization Act of 2021.   The seriousness of this new legislation cannot be overemphasized.

This article is provided for your convenience and does not constitute legal advice. The information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Other Resources


Our Founding Partner


Max (Maksim) Dilendorf, Esq.

Max (Maksim) Dilendorf’s legal practice is laser-focused on digital assets and cyber-crime cases, a domain he has passionately pursued since 2017. Over the past 7 years, Max built a distinct digital asset law practice, dedicating tens of thousands of hours to managing diverse client cases, research and engaging ...

Learn More about Max (Maksim) Dilendorf, Esq.
Max (Maksim) Dilendorf, Esq.

Adam Pollock

Adam is one of the nation’s leading young whistleblower lawyers.  He brings with him a special ability not just to litigate, but to investigate – and understand – complex organizations and transactions.  His extensive familiarity with tech issues is built on a computer science degree and work as a ...

Learn More about Adam Pollock
Adam Pollock

Bari Zahn, Esq.

Bari Zahn has nearly 20 years of experience practicing at global law firms in New York. Bari has represented a broad array of multinational clients on U.S. and cross-border transactions. She has supervised legal teams worldwide and has extensive management experience as the Founder, former CEO and General ...

Learn More about Bari Zahn, Esq.
Bari Zahn, Esq.

Steve Cohen

Steve contributes extensive business and problem-solving experience to challenges that may require litigation – or may help avoid it.  Indeed, his perspective on litigation is influenced by his experience as a three-time internet start-up CEO.

Steve served on Ronald Reagan’s 1980 presidential campaign ...

Learn More about Steve Cohen
Steve Cohen

Robin Gerofsky Kaptzan, Esq.

A New York licensed attorney with three decades of legal and business experience in the U.S. and Asia, Robin recently joined the law firm as a partner and leads the Asia-Pacific practice.

While acting as an international business lawyer and global corporate general counsel, Robin is sought out by clients ...

Learn More about Robin Gerofsky Kaptzan, Esq.
Robin Gerofsky Kaptzan, Esq.

Craig S. Redler

Craig S. Redler has held positions with Amicorp in its offices in Auckland New Zealand and Miami Florida, and Southpac Trust International, Inc. with offices in the Cook Islands and Tauranga New Zealand. His responsibilities included serving as Trustee for off-shore trusts settled by high net-worth clients ...

Learn More about Craig S. Redler
Craig S. Redler